S. O. Maxey & Co. v. Crowl
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
Plaintiff in error entered into a contract with the State Highway Commission under which it gave the statutory bond for payment for all labor and material performed and furnished in laying the pavement.
Plaintiff in error contracted with Massey et al., a corporation, to furnish sand for said project.
When the contract was completed plaintiff in error owed Massey et al. a balance of some $662. Within six months after the contract was completed, suits were commenced against plaintiff in error and his bondsmen by parties claiming to be assignees of certain laborers who had assigned to them claims…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Williamson v. Oklahoma National BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moral Insurance Co. v. StevesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Ed Hockaday & Co. v. RandolphSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936