Legal Opinion
Carter v. Carl Merveldt & Son
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 8, 1938No. 26963PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAYLESS. V. C. J.
Carl Merveldt & Son, a copartnership, instituted an action in the district court of Custer county, Okla., against Joe Biggs and others to recover a money judgment, and caused a garnishment summons to be issued against the state of Oklahoma, duly served upon' Prank Carter, State Auditor, to reach a debt supposed to be owing by the state of Oklahoma to Joe Biggs.
Plaintiff recovered judgment against Joe Biggs, and thereafter the garnishment issue was tried.
We desire to set out a history of the issue involved, and in so doing we will state matters as though they are conclusively…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jacobs v. ColcordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Market Nat. Bank of Cincinnati, Ohio v. RaspberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- United States Fire Ins. Co. v. L. C. Adam Merc. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Helms v. State Ex Rel. MifflinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Great American Life Ins. Co. v. StephensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heartsill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
- Carl Merveldt & Son v. BiggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Heartsill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959