Legal Opinion
Home Insurance v. Landmark Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 18, 1988No. D006512PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WIENER, Acting P. J.
The sole issue in this case is which of two first party insurers is liable for the loss from continuing property damage manifested during successive policy periods. On cross-motions for summary judgment brought by plaintiff Home Insurance Company and defendant Landmark Insurance Company, the court answered this question by ruling that Home, the insurer at the time of the first visible manifestations of damage, was responsible for the entire loss. As we shall explain we conclude the trial court ruled correctly and therefore affirm the judgment.
Factual and Procedural…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Remmer v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Gruol Construction Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. American InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Harbor Insurance v. Central National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- California Union Insurance v. Landmark InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Sentinel Insurance Co. v. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- United States Gypsum Co. v. Admiral InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Inland Waters Pollution Control, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.