Legal Opinion

Harbor Insurance v. Central National Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1985No. B004978PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, J.

This appeal arises from cross-claims for declaratory relief whereby successive insurers of a defendant sued for malicious prosecution of a civil action sought determination as to which of them was (or were) obligated to defend and indemnify the insured. Holding that for insurance coverage purposes malicious prosecution is an “occurrence” that happens upon favorable termination of the maliciously prosecuted action, the trial court granted summary judgment exonerating two carriers who had insured the defendant during a period which commenced after that action was filed but ended…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Remmer v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Estate of Tucker Ex Rel. Tucker v. InterscopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Villella v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Downey Venture v. LMI Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. City Of Erie, Pennsylvania v. Guaranty National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. American Star Insurance Co. v. Insurance Co. of the WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API