Harbor Insurance v. Central National Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LUCAS, J.
This appeal arises from cross-claims for declaratory relief whereby successive insurers of a defendant sued for malicious prosecution of a civil action sought determination as to which of them was (or were) obligated to defend and indemnify the insured. Holding that for insurance coverage purposes malicious prosecution is an “occurrence” that happens upon favorable termination of the maliciously prosecuted action, the trial court granted summary judgment exonerating two carriers who had insured the defendant during a period which commenced after that action was filed but ended…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Remmer v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Estate of Tucker Ex Rel. Tucker v. InterscopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Villella v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Downey Venture v. LMI Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- City Of Erie, Pennsylvania v. Guaranty National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- American Star Insurance Co. v. Insurance Co. of the WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.