Legal Opinion
Timken Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 27, 2014No. Consol. 12-00415PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
This matter is before the court on plaintiff The Timken Company’s (“Timken”) motion for judgment on the agency record pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.2. Timken challenges various aspects of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) final results rendered in the 2010-2011 review of the antidumping duty orders on ball bearings and parts thereof from France, Germany, and Italy. Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, and Italy: Final Results of Anti-dumping Duty Administrative Reviews; 2010-2011, 77 Fed.Reg. 73,415 (Dep’t Commerce Dec. 10, 2012) (“Final Results…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Union Steel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Fag Italia S.p.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Union Steel v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- DuPont Teijin Films China Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- JBF RAK LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Apex Frozen Foods Private Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Beijing Tianhai Indus. Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Beijing Tianhai Industry Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.