Legal Opinion
Apex Frozen Foods Private Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 1, 2014No. Slip Op. 14-138; Court No. 13-00283PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOLDBERG, Senior Judge:
Plaintiffs challenge the final results of an administrative review of an antidump-ing duty order on frozen warmwater shrimp from India. Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India,. 78 Fed. Reg. 42,492 (Dep’t Commerce July 16, 2013) (final admin, review) (“Final Results ”).. During the review, the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or “the agency”) assigned mandatory respondent Apex Frozen Foods Private Ltd. (“Apex”) a 3.49 percent antidumping duty rate for entries between February 1, 2011, and January 31, 2012. Id. at 42,492-93. The agency assigned the same…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Novosteel Sa v. United States, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation and U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of Usx Corporation (Now Known as United States Steel Llc)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Timken Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Apex Frozen Foods Private Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Hitachi Metals, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Xi'an Metals & Minerals Import & Export Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Nan Ya Plastics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Samsung Electronics Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.