Legal Opinion

Medcalf v. Coleman

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 13, 2003No. 98,906PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

TOM COLBERT, Vice Chief Judge:

¶ 1 Appellant, Kent Medcalf, D.O., appeals an order of the trial court refusing to reconsider a summary adjudication in favor of Appellees, Ronald Coleman, M.D.; Bruce Switzer; the Broken Arrow Medical Center, Inc. (BAMC); the Medical Executive Committee of BAMC; the Board of Directors of BAMC; and Saint Francis Hospital. The dispositive issue on appeal is one of law: whether the trial court had jurisdiction to decide Medcalfs claims. We hold it did not and affirm the court’s order.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Medcalf, an ophthalmologist, began…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Doctor Robert Sosa v. Board of Managers of the Val Verde Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Shulman v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963
  3. Reams v. Tulsa Cable Television, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  5. Strubhart v. Perry Memorial Hospital Trust AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Egan v. ST. ANTHONY'S MEDICAL CENTERSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  2. Visteon Corp. v. YazelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. Davis v. AddyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
  4. Visteon Corp. v. YazelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API