Legal Opinion
Visteon Corp. v. Yazel
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided May 7, 2004No. 100,351Published
1Opinion of the Court
91 P.3d 690 (2004)
2004 OK CIV APP 52
The Matter of the Assessment of Certain Personal Property Owned by Visteon Corporation for Tax Year 2002,
VISTEON CORPORATION, Appellant,
v.
Ken YAZEL, In his Official Capacity as County Assessor of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, Appellee.
No. 100,351.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3.
May 7, 2004.
William K. Elias, Linda Jo Blan-Byford, Elias, Books & Brown, Tulsa, OK, for Petitioner/Appellant.
Thomas G. Potts, David W. Wulfers, Cornelius P. Dukelow, James, Potts & Wulfers, and Linda K. Graves, Office of the District Attorney, Tulsa, OK, for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Thomson v. GaskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Sizova v. National Institute of Standards & TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States Ex Rel. King v. Hillcrest Health Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.