Visteon Corp. v. Yazel
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
CAROL M. HANSEN, Judge:
¶ 1 Visteon Corporation (Visteon) appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing its appeal of the Tulsa County Equalization Board’s (Board) order which established the fair cash value of Visteon’s business personal property for the tax year 2002.1 Appellee, the Tulsa County Assessor (Assessor) had moved for dismissal, arguing the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because [a] Visteon failed to give statutory notice to the Tulsa County Treasurer that it had appealed Board’s denial of its formal protest, and [b] Visteon had failed to pay its 2002…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Sizova v. National Institute of Standards & TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Shaffer v. JefferySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- In Re Estate of MacFarlineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- WILBANKS SECURITIES, INC. v. McFarlandCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
- Kennedy v. City of TalihinaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- White v. City of Del CityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- Durant Civic Foundation, Inc. v. Grand Lodge of Oklahoma of the Independent Order of Odd FellowsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
- Ford v. Tulsa Public SchoolsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.