Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 9, 2002No. 93,395PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.
T1 This cause requires us to decide if the trial court had authority to issue a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (1999 QDRO) after two prior QDROs (1998 QDRO and 1996 QDRO) were entered. We hold: in that Deborah Jackson (former wife or appellee) was awarded a formula-driven percentage of Eddie D. Jackson's (former husband or appellant) future benefit from the Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System (System) 1 as part of the divorcee decree's property division, the trial court had authority to issue the 1999 QDRO so long as it conformed to the formula spelled out in the decree…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hamid v. Sew OriginalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Hough v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Clifton v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Mayhue v. MayhueSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Smith v. Baptist Foundation of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Murray County v. Homesales, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Dilliner v. Seneca-Cayuga TribeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Board of County Commissioners v. LowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Tubbs v. State, ex rel. Teachers' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.