United States v. Dan Felix Cecil, United States of America v. Lynn Richard Johnson, United States of America v. Randy Darrell Thomas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellants Cecil, Johnson, and Thomas challenge the validity of their criminal convictions. They allege that the insufficiency of the underlying Grand Jury indictment and other problems at their trial not pertinent to this decision require the reversal of their conviction. We reverse due to the insufficiency of the indictment.
On May 23, 1978, the Grand Jury charged defendants and others with conspiring to commit offenses in violation of certain federal statutes relating to the importation and distribution of marihuana. The indictment reads as follows:
COUNT I
That beginning on or before July,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. Hugh MacLeod Pheaster, United States of America v. Angelo IncisoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- United States v. Jerry R. BohonusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. H. David Miller, United States of America v. Continental Fuel Co., Inc., United States of America v. Don A. BliesnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Wilson Tony Harrell, James Hawkins, Anthony Scire, Karl Heinz HarigCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. David RomanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Frank T. McCown United States of America v. Gary Lee Barnes, United States of America v. Gary Leslie BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.