Legal Opinion
United States v. H. David Miller, United States of America v. Continental Fuel Co., Inc., United States of America v. Don A. Bliesner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 16, 1985No. 84-3051 to 84-3053PublishedCited by 140 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Continental Fuel Company (Continental), Don A. Bliesner (Bleisner) and H. David Miller (Miller) were convicted after a jury trial of conspiring to fix the retail price of gasoline in Bannock County, Idaho, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 1 (1982)). Continental was fined $75,000; Bliesner and Miller were fined $25,000 and $35,000, respectively-
Appellants seek reversal on the following grounds:
One. The district court erred in denying Miller’s motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that section one of the Sherman Act is…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by140 opinions
- United States v. Sanchez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Luis Salgado (99-5645) Wilfredo Jambu (99-5651)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Servando Reyes-Alvarado, United States of America v. Martin Gonzalez-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Alfredo Orozco-SantillanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Amarel v. ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.