Legal Opinion
United States v. Hugh MacLeod Pheaster, United States of America v. Angelo Inciso
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 19, 1976No. 75-1004 and 74-3308PublishedCited by 281 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RENFREW, District Judge:
Appellants Pheaster and Inciso were tried before a jury in the United States District Court for the Central District of California and were convicted on all counts of a 12-count criminal indictment. Count One charged appellants, together with other unindicted co-conspirators whose names were unknown to the grand jury, with a conspiracy to kidnap and hold Larry Adell for ransom in violation of Section 1201(c), Title 18, United States Code. The remaining eleven counts charged Pheaster with depositing letters in the mail containing both requests for ransom for the release…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by281 opinions
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- United States v. Jerry R. BohonusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Commonwealth v. CinelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- State v. TerrovonaWashington Supreme Court · 1986
276 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.