Legal Opinion
Wong Tai v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 3, 1927No. 79PublishedCited by 569 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford
The plaintiff in error was indicted in -the Federal District Court for Northern California under § 37 of the Criminal Code, 1 for conspiring to commit offenses against the United States in violation of the Opium Act of 1909, as amended in 1914 and.1922. 2 He was tried and convicted; and thereupon brought the case here by a direct writ of error under § 238 of the Judicial Code, before the amendment made by the Jurisdictional Act of 1925 became effective, as one involving the application of the Constitution and in which the constitutionality of a law of the United States was drawn in question.
Th…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by569 opinions
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Paul John Carbo, Frank Palermo, Joseph Sica, Louis Tom Dragna, and Truman K. Gibson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Carmine TramuntiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Hugh MacLeod Pheaster, United States of America v. Angelo IncisoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Frank Stearns GieseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
564 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.