Legal Opinion

Kyung Ha Jung v. St. Paul's Parish

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 1, 1989No. 78 E.D. Appeal Docket 1988PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

PAPADAKOS, Justice.

This is an appeal by Kyung Ha Jung and Sung M. Jung, Appellants, from an order of the Superior Court which affirmed the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County denying Appellants’ Petition to Open Judgment of Non Pros. The issues presented are whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to open the judgment, and whether the Superior Court’s affirmance was inconsistent with its own precedent as well as precedent of this Court. For the following reasons we reverse.

The facts underlying this case are as…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Kraynick v. HERTZSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Pappas v. StefanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Coggin v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Duckson v. Wee Wheelers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Madrid v. ALPINE MOUNTAIN CORP.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Ellenbogen v. PNC Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Hopewell v. HendrieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Stabley v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API