Legal Opinion

Vartan v. Reed

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 3, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELTON, Senior Judge.

Thomas A. Beckley and Mary V. Davis, trading as Atcheson Properties (Atcheson), appeal and John 0. Vartan, t/a/d/b/a Independent American Investments (Vartan), cross-appeals from the March 23, 1993 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County which (1) denied Atcheson’s petition to intervene in Vartan’s mandamus action; (2) granted Ateheson’s petitions to intervene in Vartan’s protective land use and zoning appeals; and, (3) directed the prothonotary of Dauphin County to strike-off a settlement agreement entered between Vartan and the City of Harrisburg (the City)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Acorn Development Corp. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Croft v. Board of Supervisors of Middletown TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Hopewell v. HendrieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Moore v. ReedCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Wilson of Wallingford, Inc. v. Township of Nether ProvidenceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Atticks v. Lancaster Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Harrisburg Authority v. CIT Capital USA, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. JamesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. In re Philadelphia Health Care TrustCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Atticks v. LANCASTER TP. ZONING HEARING BD.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API