Legal Opinion

Corticelli Silk Co. v. Slosberg

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 5, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

The Superior Court has found that the parties intended to buy and sell the tract of land shown on a blue print of a map, which purported to delineate the boundaries and measurements of a vacant strip of land lying between the plaintiff’s mill buildings on the west and the defendants’ land on the east, and which appeared on the map to be seventy-five feet wide between parallel side lines.

Under ordinary circumstances such a finding made by the trial court would be well-nigh conclusive. On this record, however, it also appears from the finding that the negotiations were conducted with reference…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Snelling v. MerrittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lopinto v. HainesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Hoffman v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  3. Wilson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Cherkoss v. GasserSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Lewitt v. Park Ecclesiastical SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API