Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 5, 1939PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
This action was commenced against the named defendant; subsequently, on motion of the plaintiff, the Park City Auto Finance Company was cited in as a co-defendant. The amended complaint alleged that the latter having caused an automobile to be replevied from the plaintiff, and the plaintiff not being satisfied with the recognizance in the replevin writ and demanding a new bond, the Finance Company as principal and the named defendant as surety executed a bond, made part of the complaint, of which the prayers for relief claimed reformation so that the same should be in the form prescribed by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Snelling v. MerrittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Tesson v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- Hartford & New Haven Railroad v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
- Mishiloff v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Corticelli Silk Co. v. SlosbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ubysz v. DiPietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Hess v. Dumouchel Paper Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. GalloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Greenwich Contracting Co. v. Bonwit Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Fortier v. Newington Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.