Legal Opinion
Keating v. Basich Bros. Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 5, 1944No. Civ. 3362PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff $1,915 for damages for the unauthorized use of property which plaintiff held under lease.
A rehearing was granted in this case to permit us to íeconsider the evidence as to the amount of damages awarded to plaintiff which was very liberal under all of the circumstances. It is urged that the testimony of James A. Pascoe, upon which the amount of the award must rest, is weak and so uncertain that it should not be held sufficient to support the judgment.
The testimony of Pascoe is not all that could be desired and is not too certain. However,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Evans v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Roy v. SalisburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re Estate of RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Thompson v. StoakesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Ford v. Lou Kum ShuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Monogram Industries, Inc. v. Sar Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Hall v. Bureau of Employment AgenciesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Bixby v. BixbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Pollard v. PollardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.