Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Stoakes

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 4, 1941No. Civ. 11517PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Defendants Stoakes and Osmundsen are partners engaged in the real estate business in Oakland under the name of Highland Realty Co. Defendant Jenkins is a real estate salesman employed by the partnership. Plaintiff, Anita H. Thompson, brought the present action to recover from defendants a secret profit alleged to have been made by them in a real estate transaction in which defendants represented plaintiff as agent. From a judgment for $2,494, based on a jury verdict, the defendants appeal.

Disregarding all conflicts in the evidence, and giving to the evidence of respondent the weight to which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cent. Pac. R.R. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Calmon v. SarrailleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Merchants Trust Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. In Re Estate of RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Langford v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Crogan v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API