Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Grigsby

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 11, 2002No. 48226-2-IPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

Donna Rice (formerly known as Donna Grigsby) appeals from the trial court’s order prohibiting her from relocating with the parties’ minor children, and the court’s modification of the parties’ parenting plan naming her former husband Jon Grigsby as the “primary care parent.” Under the procedures and standards provided in RCW 26.09.405 through RCW 26.09.560, there is a rebut-table presumption that relocation will be permitted that may be rebutted by a showing that the detrimental effect of *4the relocation will outweigh any potential benefit. The trial court properly analyzed the statutory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Chapman v. PereraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. In re the Marriage of PapeWashington Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of HornerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re Marriage of HornerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In re the Marriage of FaheyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. In re the Marriage of RaskobCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Osborne v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API