In re the Marriage of Raskob
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Verellen, A.C.J.
¶1 When a parent violates the relocation provision of an agreed parenting plan, the trial *508court has authority to make major modifications to the plan. On remand, the trial court clarified its basis for finding that Nanako Tsujimoto violated the relocation provision of her agreed parenting plan with Josh Raskob.1 Nanako challenges the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law that she violated the parenting plan. She also argues that the trial court erred in modifying the residential schedule and relocation provision in the parenting plan and in awarding sanctions…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- DeHeer v. Seattle Post-IntelligencerWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Bering v. ShareWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- In re the Marriage of HornerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Amanda R. Cowan, V. Joshua T. CowanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
- Amanda R. Cowan, V. Joshua T. CowanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
- Beverly D. Van Santford v. Harold D. SherwoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Christopher Woodward v. Jessie ThomasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Christy M. Mckinley v. Benjamin S. PorterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.