Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Horner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2004No. 73540-9PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.

In this child relocation case, the trial court denied relocation and the Court of Appeals affirmed, applying the abuse of discretion standard of review. We review this moot case because it presents issues of continuing and substantial public interest. We reverse the Court of Appeals because the trial court abused its discretion by denying relocation when neither its specific findings of fact nor its oral opinion indicate consideration and balancing of the 11 child relocation factors enumerated in RCW 26.09.520.

I. WASHINGTON’S CHILD RELOCATION ACT

The legislature enacted Washington’s child…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Satomi Owners Ass'n v. Satomi, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In Re Marriage of HornerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Jaime Taormina Bisbing v. Glenn R. Bisbing, III (077533) (Sussex County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
  4. In Re Personal Restraint of MattsonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of MattsonWashington Supreme Court · 2009

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API