Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Fahey

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 20, 2011No. 40906-2-IIPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.

¶1 In this hotly contested child relocation case, Lawrence Fahey challenges the trial court’s *46decision allowing his ex-wife, Lisa Fahey, to relocate their two preteenage daughters from Puyallup, Washington, to Omak, Washington. Lawrence1 challenges the trial court’s order (1) assigning a rebuttable presumption in favor of Lisa’s decision to relocate, (2) approving the relocation, (3) restricting his visitation rights under the new parenting plan, and (4) refusing to appoint a guardian ad litem (GAL) to represent the children. He also alleges that the trial court impermissibly considered his…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. In re the Marriage of HornerWashington Supreme Court · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of ChandolaWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. In re the Marriage of McNaughtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. In re the Marriage of KimCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. In Re the Marriage of WehrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Zavala v. Twin City FoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API