Legal Opinion

Wax v. Sacks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 29, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for slander, plaintiffs appeal from an order directing the examination, by defendants, of a witness. Order reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate the notice of examination granted, with $10 costs. Respondents failed to show special circumstances warranting the examination of the person sought to be examined (Civ. Prae. Act, § 288). He is not a party or the agent or employee of a party to the action (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 121-a). Respondents deny they ever made to him any of the alleged scandalous statements which the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sommers v. New York World-Telegram Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Valentine Dolls, Inc. v. McMillanNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Augenblick v. AugenblickNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Kagan v. GairNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Munsie v. Highland HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Lipin v. SalkinNew York Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API