Legal Opinion

Kagan v. Gair

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

Motion to vacate a notice of examination of Max Wallach, individually and as the president or managing agent of certain named corporations.

Neither the corporations nor Wallach are parties to this action, or employees of parties. The notice was allegedly served pursuant to “ section 299 et seq. of the Civil Practice Act and the Rules of Civil Practice ”. Rule 121-a of the Rules of Civil Practice — the only rule under which an examination in an action may he had by notice — pertains only to an examination of a “ party, his agent or employee” (Wax v. Sacks, 280 App. Div. 900). Section 299 of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wax v. SacksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. President & Directors of Manhattan Co. v. RomNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  3. President of the Manhattan Co. v. RomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Valentine Dolls, Inc. v. McMillanNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Happell v. GenoeseNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API