Legal Opinion

Lipin v. Salkin

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdgar J. Nathan, J.

Motion to modify plaintiff’s notice of examination and the cross motion for an examination before trial of defendant as a party and a witness are disposed of as follows:

By cross-moving for an order directing the examination of defendant, plaintiff has abandoned his original notice of *878examination. Accordingly, the motion to modify that notice is academic and is dismissed. Since the objections to the notice are applicable to the cross motion for an examination before trial, those objections have been considered by the court in disposing of the cross motion.

Insofar as the cross motion seeks to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wax v. SacksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. Augenblick v. AugenblickNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Shoreham Opreating Corp. v. PeyserNew York Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Valentine Dolls, Inc. v. McMillanNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API