Legal Opinion

Sommers v. New York World-Telegram Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 24, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a Ebel action examination should not be ordered on matters upon which the movant does not have the burden of proof (McDougall V. News Syndicate Co., 275 App. Div. 1052); nor should a party be examined upon matters not arising from the pleadings (Johansen v. Gray, 279 App. Div. 108). Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur; Johnston, J., concurs in the modification insofar as it strikes out items 1 and 2 of the first ordering paragraph and refuses the examination with respect to such items, but dissents from the modification insofar as it strikes out the third ordering paragraph and items 3…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guenther v. Ridgway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. Johansen v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  3. Mason v. New York Review Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  4. Hollien v. Tarrytown Daily News, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wax v. SacksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. Di Geronimo v. PlotnickCivil Court of the City of New York · 1963
  3. Schneider v. DoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API