Legal Opinion

Munsie v. Highland Hospital

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James C. O ’Bribe", J.

The plaintiff proceeded by notice to examine the defendant as an adverse party, by two named persons and two persons not named but identified as holding specified offices or positions with the defendant. Defendant states, and plaintiff does not deny, that one of the persons named as a proposed subject of the examination, viz.; Catherine Ann Ber-nardini, a nurse, is no longer in the employ of the defendant. Upon the notice served by the plaintiff, there may be taken only the deposition of officers, agents and employees of the defendant. It is not applicable to witnesses…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fonda v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  2. General Rubber Co. v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Longacre v. . Yonkers Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Murphy v. KeenanNew York Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Taddeo v. TiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1958
  2. Gooden v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API