Legal Opinion

Kohler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 15, 1987No. C3-87-792, C9-87-845PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Barry Arnold appeals from a judgment entered in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company on its summary judgment motion. The trial court held that Arnold had elected his remedy by actively pursuing worker’s compensation benefits and therefore Arnold could not proceed against his co-employee, Steven Kohler, for his alleged negligence, or against Kohler’s insurer. We affirm.

FACTS

Arnold was injured when the truck in which he was a passenger left the road and rolled over. Marvin Quade, owner and operator of Quade Breeder Services, Inc., which is in the business…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Peterson v. KludtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. First National Bank v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Wiebke v. Richardson & Sons, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Steen v. Those Underwriters at Lloyds, London Signatory to Policy No. E0100191Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Connors v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. Haavisto v. PerpichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Vesta State Bank v. Independent State Bank of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Haavisto v. PerpichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API