Legal Opinion

Rudnitski v. Seely

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 16, 1990No. C0-89-43PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Justice.

This case presents us with two issues: (1) whether an action alleging that a contract for deed vendee had committed waste survives the vendor’s cancellation of the contract, and, (2) whether a contract for deed vendor can maintain an action after its cancellation for conversion of personal property which was not described in the contract for deed. In granting the contract vendees summary judgment, the trial court ruled that the election of remedies doctrine prevented the maintenance of actions on both claims. In reversing, the court of appeals panel held that the action for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. Meyer v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hildegarde, Inc. v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Wayzata Enterprises, Inc. v. HermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Hasan v. McDonald's Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brizendine v. ConradSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  2. Christensen v. Milbank Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. TCI Business Capital, Inc. v. Five Star American Die Casting, LLC, Brian T. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  4. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. Paisley Park Enterprises, Inc. v. BoxillDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API