State v. Holway
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] Thomas Holway and his ex-wife, Ellie Holway, were co-defendants tried together and convicted of three counts of delivery of drug paraphernalia in violation of SDCL 22-42A-4 and SDCL 22-3-3. The Holways allege a violation of procedural due process by claiming SDCL 22-42A-4 is unconstitutionally vague. Both defendants also appeal the sufficiency of the evidence as it relates to their intent to sell the smoking devices to contain, conceal or inhale a controlled substance, as well as their knowledge of the objects’ drug-related nature. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Posters 'N' Things, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. KnechtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BuchholzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HaugeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MoranSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. LaPlanteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Daily v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Employment Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- State v. LaplanteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.