State v. I-90 TRUCK HAVEN SERVICES, INC.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice (on reassignment).
[¶ 1.] An employee of 1-90 Truck Haven Services, Inc. (Truck Haven), pled guilty to selling alcohol to a minor. Several months later, the State requested that the magistrate court impose an administrative sanction or fine on Truck Haven. Truck Haven filed a motion to dismiss. Although the magistrate court refused to dismiss the case against Truck Haven, the circuit court later reversed the magistrate court’s order and found that an administrative fine could not be imposed on a licensee pursuant to SDCL 35-4-78 through SDCL 35-4-78.4. We reverse.
FACTS…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- US West Communications, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- De Smet Insurance Co. of South Dakota v. GibsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Faircloth v. Raven Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sanford v. SanfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Gloe v. Union Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Lewis & Clark Rural Water System, Inc. v. SeebaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Argus Leader v. HagenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. WilsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.