Legal Opinion

Morton v. Adair County Excise Board

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 19, 1989No. 72181PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Vice Chief Justice.

The dispositive question is whether, in the process of reducing county office budgets to meet revenue shortfall, preference for funding should be given to a statutorily mandated position of county election board’s chief clerk, whose specific duties no one else is required or permitted to perform, over the county purchasing agent, whose responsibilities, when no one holds that job, must, by force of law, be discharged by an elected county official — the county clerk. Although we answer in the affirmative, we are compelled to affirm the trial court’s refusal to issue…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  5. State Ex Rel. Ogden v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Fent v. Contingency Review BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  3. Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System v. City of SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  5. Board of County Commisioners v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API