Legal Opinion
Fent v. Contingency Review Board
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 1, 2007No. 103,714PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
1 1 The dispositive issues tendered by this original proceeding are: (1) Is the mandatory participation by the legislative members of the Contingency Review Board (CRB) in the process of approval of expenditures from appropriations to the Oklahoma Opportunity Fund 3 (Opportunity Fund) an impermissible intrusion upon the executive branch's powers in violation of Art. 4, § 1, Ok. Const.? 4 and if so (2) Are the offending provisions of 62 0.8.8upp.2006 § 48 5 severable from the remainder of the Act? and (8) Is the CRB's approval of funding to the Ardmore Development Authority for two related…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Schovanec v. Archdiocese of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- LEE v. BUENOSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Powers v. DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Deutsche Bank National Trust v. BrumbaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.