Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sotomayok
Under this Court’s state-action immunity doctrine, when a local governmental entity acts pursuant to a clearly articulated and affirmatively expressed state policy to displace competition, it is exempt from scrutiny under the federal antitrust laws. In this case, we must decide whether a Geor gia law that creates special-purpose public entities called hospital authorities and gives those entities general corporate powers, including the power to acquire hospitals, clearly articulates and affirmatively expresses a state policy to permit acquisitions that substantially lessen competition.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- CTS Corp. v. WaldburgerSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- N.C. State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. Fed. Trade Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. William Robert Bernard, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Auraria Student Housing at the Regency, LLC v. Campus Village Apartments, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.