N.C. State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. Fed. Trade Comm'n
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy
This case arises from an antitrust challenge to the actions of a state regulatory board. A majority of the board's members are engaged in the active practice of the profession it regulates. The question is whether the board's actions are protected from Sherman Act regulation under the doctrine of state-action antitrust immunity, as defined and applied in this Court's decisions beginning with Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943).
I
A
In its Dental Practice Act (Act), North Carolina has declared the practice of dentistry to be a matter of public concern requiring…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- McWane, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Auraria Student Housing at the Regency, LLC v. Campus Village Apartments, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Babb v. Cal. Teachers Ass'nDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Crockett v. Nea-AlaskaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2019
- Chicago Studio Rental, Incorpo v. Illinois Department of CommercCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.