CTS Corp. v. Waldburger
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
Held : The judgment is reversed.
723 F.3d 434 , reversed.
2Opinion of the Court · KennedyJustice Kennedy
Pp. 2182 - 2188.(a) The outcome here turns on whether § 9658 distinguishes between statutes of limitations and statutes of repose, which are both used to limit the temporal extent or duration of tort liability. There is considerable common ground in the policies underlying the two, but their specified time periods are measured differently and they seek to attain different purposes and objectives. Statutes of limitations are designed to promote justice by encouraging *2179 plaintiffs to pursue claims diligently and begin to run when a claim…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Kennedy; Opinion of the Court · Kennedy; Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.
3Cases cited36 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by198 opinions
- Anthony Smith v. Ron DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Los Angeles Lakers, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Russell Dusek v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- California Public Employees' Retirement System v. ANZ Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- CTS Corp. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
193 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.