Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. King

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided October 8, 1954No. 948PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. BROSMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction following a rehearing. The accused was originally found guilty, by a general court-martial convened in Korea, of cowardly conduct in the presence of the enemy- — -in that he wrongfully refused to report to his battle station, in violation of Article 99, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 693. He was sentenced to receive a dishonorable discharge, as well as to total forfeitures and confinement at hard labor for fifteen years. Later we reversed that conviction and ordered a rehearing — for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. SimmonsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  2. United States v. HeimsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. HallettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. LamerandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. HamiltonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. DeanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  3. United States v. PinkstonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  4. Foley v. ZieglerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  5. Katherine E. (Tardiff) Sullivan v. Lawrence D. TardiffSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API