Legal Opinion

United States v. Hamilton

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 28, 1954No. 4325PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. BROSMAN, Judge:

The accused, Hamilton, was tried by general court-martial under a specification alleging that “in the presence of the enemy, [he] was guilty of cowardly conduct, in that he wrongfully failed to join his patrol as medical aid man as it was his duty to do” — a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 99, 50 USC § 693. Pursuant to instructions from the law officer to the effect that the specification contained as an included offense the crime of wrongful failure to perform duty in the presence of the enemy, in violation of Article 134…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. DellerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  2. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. O'NeilUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  4. United States v. HallettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. VoorheesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API