Legal Opinion
Sarazin v. Wright Aeronautical Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 12, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, District Judge.
This action is brought by the patentee Sarazin and the exclusive licensee Hispano-Suiza, to enjoin an alleged infringement of two patents for “Means adapted to reduce the torsional oscillations of crank shafts”» The first (referred to during the trial as the link type), is No. 2,079,227, was applied for on July 30, 1931, and issued on May 4, 1937. The second is Reissue No. 20,773, and was originally applied for with the first. The Patent Office required a division, the application was renewed on February 29, 1936, and granted May 4, 1937, the patent issuing as No.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Catalin Corporation of America v. Catalazuli Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- General Electric Co. v. P. R. Mallory & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1923
- The Pietro CampanellaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1974
- Clark v. Wright Aeronautical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- J. R. Clark Co. v. Murray Metal Products Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1953
- Wright Aeronautical Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948