Legal Opinion
J. R. Clark Co. v. Murray Metal Products Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided July 23, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 5683PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANNAY, District Judge.
This is a civil action for alleged infringement of Claim 1 of the patent to John, No. 2,276,981, and an action for unfair competition based upon the use of flat expanded metal in an ironing table top. Plaintiff seeks to restrain the defendant from the alleged patent infringement and unfair competition and asks for an accounting by defendant for damages occasioned by such alleged patent infringement and such unfair competition.
Defendant admits the ownership of the patent in plaintiff and the jurisdiction of this court, but denies the charge of infringement and the charge…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- The J. R. Clark Company v. Murray Metal Products Company, Inc., Murray Metal Products Company, Inc. v. The J. R. Clark CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Smith Industries International v. Hughes Tool CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Barnard v. Fruehauf Trailer Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1966
- Lodge & Shipley Co. v. Holstein & KappertDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970