Legal Opinion

The Pietro Campanella

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided October 13, 1942No. 2498, 2499PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

The present war with Italy has led to another unusual situation with respect to the possession, ownership, title and legal interest in the two Italian cargo ships involved in the above entitled cases. The present Alien Property Custodian has now filed a petition praying to be substiUited for the prior owners of the ships who are the “claimants” of the ships in these admiralty cases instituted by the United States for their forfeiture. The extent and scope of the prayer for substitution, and the expressed purpose thereof, is to make the Alien Property Custodian dominus…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Lord v. VeazieSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  4. Watts, Watts & Co. v. Unione Austriaca Di NavigazioneSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Cummings v. Deutsche Bank Und DiscontogesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Hamburg-American Line v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
  3. The AntoinettaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. United States v. the San LeonardoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942
  5. The Pietro CampanellaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API