Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wright Aeronautical Corp. v. General Motors Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 9, 1948No. 8808Published

1DissentLindley, District Judge

*644Defendant mounts on a disc affixed to the crankshaft six bifilar pendulum bal-ancers, the multiple number being so provided and designed as to eliminate vibrations of different frequencies. Each one of these pendulum rolls around with the disc and the crankshaft and, at the same time, oscillates to and fro according to the laws of centrifugal force. For each balancer two holes about 2 inches apart are drilled in the disc and two corresponding holes of oversize and larger than those in the disc are drilled through the balancer. In each of the two holes on each disc is placed a steel roller and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Ferdinand Gutmann Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. National Tube Co. v. MarkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  3. Ceramic Process Co. v. General Porcelain Enameling & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  4. Sarazin v. Wright Aeronautical Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API