Legal Opinion
McCann v. Union Bank & Trust Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 1935No. L. A. 15219PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiffs, Frank and Corinne Mc-Cann, have made application to this court for a writ of supersedeas and an order restraining the enforcement of a judgment obtained against them in the municipal court of the city of Los Angeles by the Union Bank and Trust Company pending the determination of an appeal from an order made by the superior court in Los Angeles County in another action between the sames parties.
On April 6, 1933, the bank filed a complaint in unlawful detainer in the municipal court. On January 31, 1935, pursuant to a remittitur from the appellate department of the superior…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Hicks v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Imperial Water Co. No. 3 v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Tyler v. PresleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- In Re GravesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Modern Barber Colleges, Inc. v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Ashland Oil & Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- City of South Gate v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Sacramento County Department of Social Welfare v. Javier L.California Court of Appeal · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.