Legal Opinion

Martin v. Rosen

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1934No. Civ. 9974PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, J., pro tem.

Respondent sued appellant in the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles in case numbered 334809 of the files of that court for the recovery of $525, alleged balance unpaid on an employment agency contract. Appellant answered denying any indebtedness and pleaded illegality of the contract sued upon, and then commenced an action in the superior court against respondent to recover the sum of $2,520, alleged to have been paid by him to respondent under the same contract sued upon in the municipal court action, which contract it is alleged is illegal and void by virtue of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Hyatt v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Hicks v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Luckenbach v. KrempelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ShortsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. McCann v. Union Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Milne v. GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Mascot Pictures Corp. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API