Legal Opinion

Lovelock Mercantile Co. v. Lovelock Irrigation District

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1928No. 2831PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Ducker, J.:: This is an application by the appellants for a writ of supersedeas to restrain the respondents from including within the boundaries of the Lovelock irrigation district any lands, blocks, or lots of appellants included within the city limits of the city of Lovelock.

Appellants commenced an action against respondents in the Second judicial district court and obtained a ■restraining order and order to show cause why an injunction pendente lite should not issue. The action was by stipulation transferred to the Sixth judicial district court. After the case was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Imperial Water Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Rose v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Wood v. Board of Fire CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Wollenshlager v. RiegelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kress v. CoreyNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Dodge Bros. v. General Petroleum Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1932
  3. White Pine Power District No. 9 v. Public Service CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Kress v. CoreyNevada Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API