Chapman v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The pleadings in this suit on a policy of fire insurance were in short by consent, with leave to give in evidence matters which might be specially pleaded. The trial was upon an agreed statement of facts, by the court, without a jury, and judgment was for defendant.
The question of waiver of default in payment of premium note (Insurance Co. v. Williams, 200 Ala. 681, 77 So. 159), or election (Galliher v. State Mutual Life Ins. Co., 150 Ala. 549, 43 So. 833, 124 Am. St. Rep. 83; Rose v. Citizens’ Ins. Co., 210 Ala. 72, 97 So. 81), cannot be presented by incorporating in the record proper the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Insurance Co. of North America v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Galliher v. State Mutual Life Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Williams v. Woodward Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Stephenson v. AllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GarthrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Summit Coal Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Solnick v. BallardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Jiles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Jerrell v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.