Legal Opinion

Jerrell v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 23, 1931No. 5 Div. 86PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

This cause was submitted in the court below on an agreed statement of facts, resulting in a judgment in favor of the Roanoke Banking Company as intervener, the rights of which were based upon an assignment of the policy sued upon to said bank by the insured. It may be here noted that since the rendition of said judgment the above-named bank has ceased to do business and its affairs are now being administered by the superintendent of banks, who, by agreement of all parties, is substituted as a party ,to the cause in lieu of the Roanoke Banking Company. To review said judgment plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Peters v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. Chapman v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. White v. RoeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. Morris v. Birmingham Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. WilsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Huguley v. Republic Steel Corp.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API