Jiles v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
No questions as to the sufficiency of the venire or of the action of the court in impaneling the jury are reserved and presented. Hardley v. State, 202 Ala. 24, 79 So. 362; Carmichael v. State, 213 Ala. 264, 104 So. 638; Charley v. State, 204 Ala. 687, 87 So. 177; Jackson v. State, 213 Ala. 143, 104 So. 220; White v. State, 209 Ala. 546, 96 So. 709.
The record proper has been examined (Howerton v. State, 191 Ala. 13, 67 So. 979), and there is no error “apparent on the record,” and no “questions [are] reserved by bill of exceptions” (Code, § 3258; Hill v. State, 21 Ala. App. 310, 107 So. 7S9).
Th…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- McGhee v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Ex Parte CowartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- All States Life Ins. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Hewett v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936